|

ENGINEERING
R&D
FEBRUARY 1999
A
four month pilot study conducted at the the Interstate
Brands Wonderbread Bakery in Columbus OH concludede
that a two-stage biop-trickling filter composed of environmentally
- availavble bacteria immobilized on solid polypropolene
fibers reduced ethanol emmissions by 85 to 100 percent.
As shown on the table on page 28. The system averaged
91 percent ethanol-removal efficiency during the study
period. Excluding filter downtime.
The
project was funded by the EPA-USDA, the Lincoln Food
Processing Center at the University of Nebraska and
the American Bakers Association (ABA). The EPA supplied
the trailer mounted biofiltration unit designed by PRD
Tech. Inc and incorporating proprietarty PRD support
mediaPRD Tech worked with the department of chemical
engineering at the University of Cincinnati to conduct
the study. Malcom Pirnie, Inc. (columbus, OH) designed
and installed the duct work connecting the oven stack
to the bio filter.
The
Food Manufacturing Coalition (FMC) for Innovation and
Technology Transfer functioned as project manager via
R. J. Phillips and Associates (Sterling, VA). Composed
of eight food industry associations plus private firms,
government entities and universities. The FMC iis assessing
opportiunities for technology trandfer to other food
industry segnmnets.

In
biotrickling, a recycled water/nutrient stream distributes
nutrients (such as phosphorous and nitrogen) to bacteria
immobilized on support media made of non-degradable
polypropylene fibers. (Sources U. of Cincinnati; PRD
Tech)
Results
of the pilot study were presented by Mr. Rakesh Govind,
professor of chemical engineering at the University
of Cincinnati and the Director of PRD Tech. At the annual
meeting of the American Insttitute of Chemical Engineers
(AIChE) November 19 in Miami Beach. “Not only has this
system proven to significantly reduce ethanol emmissions,
it can be significantly more cost effective thean currently-available
technologies.” Govind reported.
BIOFILTER
DRAWBACKS
Ethanol a by product of fermentation, is a voliatile
organic compound (VOC). Through a complex interaction
with sunlight and nitrogen oxides, ethanol and other
VOCs contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone
that can potentialyy have an adverse impact on human
health and the environment. Roughly 98 percent of the
VOCs produced in bakery ovens are ethanol.
The
most commom approach to reducing ethanol emmissions
is to treat them with biofilters, where bacteria degrade
or transform the contaminants. Biofilters typically
use peat or compost to sustain the micro-bial Populations.
But because the concentration of ethanol emissions varies
with pro-duction schedule and with product (bread. pastry
cake etc.). bacte-ria growth can be uneven: overpro-duction
clogs fil-ters; underutilization starves the bacteria.
Moreover, because bacteria consume the biofilter material.
It must regularly be replaced. These systems can also
be "extremely bulky." said Govind. Where space is at
a premium. the system must often be located on rooftops.
Requiring structural modifications to support the load
and thus adding, capital cost.

BIOTRICKLING
BENEFITS
Biotrickling, Govind explained, improves upon biofiltration.
In biotrickling, a recycled water/nutrient stream distributes
nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen) to the bacteria
and keeps the filter moist. Because the support housing
of the microbes is made of synthetic materials, and
because the nutrients are not trickled in, the support
media can last indefinitely. The system uses environmentally-available
bacteria and no special strains are needed. The filter
is self-cleaning, so bacteria can not clog it with unlimited
growth. Because the system is at the end of the baking
operation. The microbes cannot contaminate the baked
goods. While microbes thrive in the ambient exhaust
temperatures. Then cannot survive the high temperatures
of upstream gases (more than 350' F).
Although
ethanol concentrations vary with product. the biotrickling
filter main-tained removal efficiencies exceeding 80
percent for 99.6 percent of its operating time - even
when the ethanol concentra-tion was abruptly increased
during shut-down periods, however, the microbial decay
rate was slow, enabling, the biofilter to regain more
than 95 percent removal efficiency in just a few hours.
Because there are no supplemental fuel require-ments
or catalyst replacements (as with catalytic oxidizers),
blotrickling can save operating, costs. Furthermore,
the system operates at ambient temperatures and pressure,
emits no nitrogen oxides and emits less CO2. "There
are no downsides to this technology." Govind observed.
The
pilot study provides a plus or minus 30 percent estimate
of capital and operating costs for a biotrickling filter
applied to treating ethanol emissions from bakeries.
More precise estimates can be calcu-lated only after
a system has been designed for a specific plant.
Biotrickling
can potentially be adapted to other fermentation processes
such as brewing, Govind added.
| Summary
of Biotrickling Filter Performance |
|
Percent
Ethanol Removal Efficiency
|
Percent
of Total Operating Time*
|
|
<80%
|
0.4%
|
|
>80%
|
99.6%
|
|
>90%
|
54.4%
|
|
Average
91%
|
x
|
| *Does
not include downtime of the biotrickling filter
(Sources: Unversity of Cincinnati; PRD Tech) |
^
TOP
|